Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks

Whether you’re researching Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks internet service at your current address, comparing internet options for potential locations, or just researching alternatives, this detailed comparison will help you understand which provider best suits you.

Blue Mountain and LS Networks compete directly in approximately 0.56% of their service areas, with Blue Mountain covering 185,145 people nationwide and LS Networks serving 1,588. Blue Mountain primarily delivers internet through a fiber connection; LS Networks specializes in fiber connections. Jump directly to specific sections using the links below, or continue reading for our comprehensive comparison of Blue Mountain and LS Networks's availability, speeds, pricing, and customer satisfaction.

Jump to: Availability | Speeds | Plans & Pricing | Customer Reviews | Fees

Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks | Pros & Cons

Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks | Availability

Blue Mountain and LS Networks have distinct coverage footprints across the United States. Our interactive map shows exactly where each provider offers service and where they overlap, helping you understand your options.

Both Providers Available | Blue Mountain Available | LS Networks Available | No Coverage

Blue Mountain currently offers internet service in 75 cities and 14 counties across 2 states, reaching approximately 185,145 residents. Their service area includes major markets like Bend, OR; Hermiston, OR; and Redmond, OR. By comparison, LS Networks serves 1,588 residents in 8 cities and 6 counties in 1 state, with a presence in population centers such as Bend, OR; Redmond, OR; and Prineville, OR.

Internet availability can vary significantly even within specific cities and zip codes. For the most accurate information about Blue Mountain and LS Networks at your location, use our address search tool:

Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks | Speeds & Technology

Blue Mountain and LS Networks utilize different network technologies to deliver internet service, resulting in varying speed capabilities across their service areas.

Across their service areas, Blue Mountain primarily delivers internet through fiber, available to 32.4% of their customers. They also offer cable to 19.1% of their coverage area. LS Networks relies on fiber technology, which comprises 100.0% of their network, this is the only connection type they offer.

In terms of potential speeds across the country, Blue Mountain offers higher overall speeds, with speeds for most covered areas averaging 575 Mbps compared to LS Networks's average speed of 453 Mbps. When examining their overlapping service areas, Blue Mountain delivers faster speeds in 5.19% of locations where both providers operate, similar speeds in 4.90%, and slower speeds in 89.90%.

The availability of each provider's fastest technology varies significantly by location. Blue Mountain's premium Fiber service reaches 32.4% of their coverage area. Meanwhile, LS Networks's top-tier Fiber is available to 100.0% of their footprint. Even within the same technology type, speed offerings can vary based on local infrastructure investments.

Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks | Plans & Pricing

Unfortunately, neither Blue Mountain nor LS Networks has complied with FCC requirements to provide their broadband label data in the required machine-readable format. This lack of transparency from both providers makes it impossible to offer you standardized, accurate plan comparisons. While we await their compliance with these federal consumer protection measures, we recommend visiting their websites or contacting them directly for pricing information.

At ISP Reports, we simplify complex data to help you make informed decisions. Even without standardized pricing data, you can still explore customer reviews, local speed tests, and detailed coverage maps. To discover all available providers at your location, use our comprehensive address search tool

Blue Mountain Plans

LS Networks Plans

Most households with 3-5 users need download speeds of at least 100 Mbps for smooth streaming, video conferencing, and everyday internet usage. Larger households or those with heavy users (gamers, 4K streamers, or remote workers) should consider plans with speeds of 300 Mbps or more for optimal performance.

Any prices listed are the base service rates and may not include additional charges such as equipment fees, installation costs, or other service-related expenses. For a comprehensive view of all potential charges, refer to our Fees & Details section below.

Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks | Customer Ratings & Reviews

Compare how real customers rate Blue Mountain and LS Networks based on our comprehensive database of verified customer reviews across all service types.

When comparing customer satisfaction, Blue Mountain earns an overall rating of 1.00 / 5 stars from 1 customer reviews, while LS Networks maintains a 0.00 / 5 rating from 0 reviews. LS Networks outperforms Blue Mountain by 0.00 points in overall satisfaction. Blue Mountain's best-rated service is their cable offering at 1.00 / 5 stars, compared to LS Networks's highest-rated service, , at 0.00 / 5 stars.

When comparing internet providers, remember that advertised prices rarely tell the complete story. Equipment fees alone can add $10-15 per month to your bill, while installation charges, early termination fees, and data overage penalties can significantly increase your total cost of service. Consider these additional costs alongside monthly rates when determining which provider offers the better value for your specific needs.

Blue Mountain vs. LS Networks | Top Cities

Blue Mountain serves 75 cities while LS Networks is available in 8 cities nationwide. The tables below highlight their largest markets and areas where customers can choose between both providers.