Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain

Whether you’re researching Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain internet service at your current address, comparing internet options for potential locations, or just researching alternatives, this detailed comparison will help you understand which provider best suits you.

Hunter Communications and Blue Mountain compete directly in approximately 0.00% of their service areas, with Hunter Communications covering 972,151 people nationwide and Blue Mountain serving 185,145. Hunter Communications primarily delivers internet through a fiber connection; Blue Mountain specializes in fiber connections. Jump directly to specific sections using the links below, or continue reading for our comprehensive comparison of Hunter Communications and Blue Mountain’s availability, speeds, pricing, and customer satisfaction.

Jump to: Availability | Speeds | Plans & Pricing | Customer Reviews | Fees

Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain | Pros & Cons

Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain | Availability

Hunter Communications and Blue Mountain have distinct coverage footprints across the United States. Our interactive map shows exactly where each provider offers service and where they overlap, helping you understand your options.

Both Providers Available | Hunter Communications Available | Blue Mountain Available | No Coverage

Hunter Communications currently offers internet service in 244 cities and 23 counties across 3 states, reaching approximately 972,151 residents. Their service area includes major markets like Portland, OR; Salem, OR; and Eugene, OR. By comparison, Blue Mountain serves 185,145 residents in 75 cities and 14 counties in 2 states, with a presence in population centers such as Bend, OR; Hermiston, OR; and Redmond, OR.

Internet availability can vary significantly even within specific cities and zip codes. For the most accurate information about Hunter Communications and Blue Mountain at your location, use our address search tool:

Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain | Speeds & Technology

Hunter Communications and Blue Mountain utilize different network technologies to deliver internet service, resulting in varying speed capabilities across their service areas.

Across their service areas, Hunter Communications primarily delivers internet through fiber, available to 43.9% of their customers. They also offer cable to less than 1% of their coverage area. Blue Mountain relies on fiber technology, which comprises 32.4% of their network, with cable available in 19.1% of their service locations.

In terms of potential speeds across the country, Hunter Communications offers higher overall speeds, with speeds for most covered areas averaging 1,222 Mbps compared to Blue Mountain’s average speed of 575 Mbps. When examining their overlapping service areas, Hunter Communications delivers faster speeds in 100.00% of locations where both providers operate, similar speeds in 0.00%, and slower speeds in 0.00%.

The availability of each provider’s fastest technology varies significantly by location. Hunter Communications’s premium Fiber service reaches 43.9% of their coverage area. Meanwhile, Blue Mountain’s top-tier Fiber is available to 32.4% of their footprint. Even within the same technology type, speed offerings can vary based on local infrastructure investments.

Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain | Plans & Pricing

Below are the current internet plans and pricing details for Hunter Communications, drawn from our independently maintained pricing database. The source and verification date for each provider's plans are noted beneath the table. Unfortunately, Blue Mountain has not complied with FCC requirements to provide their broadband label data, limiting transparency and the ability for consumers to make direct comparisons.

If you represent Blue Mountain, getting listed is simple: publish your machine-readable broadband label file, or send your current plan lineup through our contact page, and your plans will appear here shortly after verification.

Hunter Communications Plans

Blue Mountain Plans

Most households with 3-5 users need download speeds of at least 100 Mbps for smooth streaming, video conferencing, and everyday internet usage. Larger households or those with heavy users (gamers, 4K streamers, or remote workers) should consider plans with speeds of 300 Mbps or more for optimal performance.

Any prices listed are the base service rates and may not include additional charges such as equipment fees, installation costs, or other service-related expenses. For a comprehensive view of all potential charges, refer to our Fees & Details section below.

Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain | Customer Ratings & Reviews

Compare how real customers rate Hunter Communications and Blue Mountain based on our comprehensive database of verified customer reviews across all service types.

When comparing customer satisfaction, Hunter Communications earns an overall rating of 4.33 / 5 stars from 6 customer reviews, while Blue Mountain maintains a 1.00 / 5 rating from 1 reviews. Hunter Communications outperforms Blue Mountain by 3.3 points in overall satisfaction. Hunter Communications’s best-rated service is their Fiber offering at 4.33 / 5 stars, compared to Blue Mountain’s highest-rated service, Cable, at 1.00 / 5 stars.

Fees vary by plan and location. The fees shown apply to most plans; check with the provider for costs specific to your plan.

When comparing internet providers, remember that advertised prices rarely tell the complete story. Equipment fees alone can add $10-15 per month to your bill, while installation charges, early termination fees, and data overage penalties can significantly increase your total cost of service. Consider these additional costs alongside monthly rates when determining which provider offers the better value for your specific needs.

Hunter Communications vs. Blue Mountain | Top Cities

Hunter Communications serves 244 cities while Blue Mountain is available in 75 cities nationwide. The tables below highlight their largest markets and areas where customers can choose between both providers.