EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks

Whether you’re researching EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks internet service at your current address, comparing internet options for potential locations, or just researching alternatives, this detailed comparison will help you understand which provider best suits you.

EarthLink and Hawk Networks compete directly in approximately 0.06% of their service areas, with EarthLink covering 268,204,138 people nationwide and Hawk Networks serving 191,958. EarthLink primarily delivers internet through a DSL connection; Hawk Networks specializes in DSL connections. Jump directly to specific sections using the links below, or continue reading for our comprehensive comparison of EarthLink and Hawk Networks's availability, speeds, pricing, and customer satisfaction.

Jump to: Availability | Speeds | Plans & Pricing | Customer Reviews | Fees

EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks | Pros & Cons

EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks | Availability

EarthLink and Hawk Networks have distinct coverage footprints across the United States. Our interactive map shows exactly where each provider offers service and where they overlap, helping you understand your options.

Both Providers Available | EarthLink Available | Hawk Networks Available | No Coverage

EarthLink currently offers internet service in 40,546 cities and 2,905 counties across 48 states, reaching approximately 268,204,138 residents. Their service area includes major markets like New York, NY; Los Angeles, CA; and Chicago, IL. By comparison, Hawk Networks serves 191,958 residents in 35 cities and 10 counties in 6 states, with a presence in population centers such as Las Cruces, NM; Tucson, AZ; and Centralia, WA.

Internet availability can vary significantly even within specific cities and zip codes. For the most accurate information about EarthLink and Hawk Networks at your location, use our address search tool:

EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks | Speeds & Technology

EarthLink and Hawk Networks utilize different network technologies to deliver internet service, resulting in varying speed capabilities across their service areas.

Across their service areas, EarthLink primarily delivers internet through DSL, available to 41.6% of their customers. They also offer fiber to 41.4% of their coverage area. Hawk Networks relies on DSL technology, which comprises less than 1% of their network, with fixed wireless available in 99.9% of their service locations.

In terms of potential speeds across the country, EarthLink offers higher overall speeds, with speeds for most covered areas averaging 1,411 Mbps compared to Hawk Networks's average speed of 277 Mbps. When examining their overlapping service areas, EarthLink delivers faster speeds in 15.25% of locations where both providers operate, similar speeds in 2.13%, and slower speeds in 82.62%.

The availability of each provider's fastest technology varies significantly by location. EarthLink's premium Fiber service reaches 41.4% of their coverage area. Meanwhile, Hawk Networks's top-tier DSL is available to 0.1% of their footprint. Even within the same technology type, speed offerings can vary based on local infrastructure investments.

EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks | Plans & Pricing

Unfortunately, neither EarthLink nor Hawk Networks has complied with FCC requirements to provide their broadband label data in the required machine-readable format. This lack of transparency from both providers makes it impossible to offer you standardized, accurate plan comparisons. While we await their compliance with these federal consumer protection measures, we recommend visiting their websites or contacting them directly for pricing information.

At ISP Reports, we simplify complex data to help you make informed decisions. Even without standardized pricing data, you can still explore customer reviews, local speed tests, and detailed coverage maps. To discover all available providers at your location, use our comprehensive address search tool

EarthLink Plans

Hawk Networks Plans

Most households with 3-5 users need download speeds of at least 100 Mbps for smooth streaming, video conferencing, and everyday internet usage. Larger households or those with heavy users (gamers, 4K streamers, or remote workers) should consider plans with speeds of 300 Mbps or more for optimal performance.

Any prices listed are the base service rates and may not include additional charges such as equipment fees, installation costs, or other service-related expenses. For a comprehensive view of all potential charges, refer to our Fees & Details section below.

EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks | Customer Ratings & Reviews

Compare how real customers rate EarthLink and Hawk Networks based on our comprehensive database of verified customer reviews across all service types.

When comparing customer satisfaction, EarthLink earns an overall rating of 3.67 / 5 stars from 12 customer reviews, while Hawk Networks maintains a 0.00 / 5 rating from 0 reviews. Hawk Networks outperforms EarthLink by 0.00 points in overall satisfaction. EarthLink's best-rated service is their fiber offering at 4.20 / 5 stars, compared to Hawk Networks's highest-rated service, , at 0.00 / 5 stars.

When comparing internet providers, remember that advertised prices rarely tell the complete story. Equipment fees alone can add $10-15 per month to your bill, while installation charges, early termination fees, and data overage penalties can significantly increase your total cost of service. Consider these additional costs alongside monthly rates when determining which provider offers the better value for your specific needs.

EarthLink vs. Hawk Networks | Top Cities

EarthLink serves 40,546 cities while Hawk Networks is available in 35 cities nationwide. The tables below highlight their largest markets and areas where customers can choose between both providers.