ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications

Whether you’re researching ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications internet service at your current address, comparing internet options for potential locations, or just researching alternatives, this detailed comparison will help you understand which provider best suits you.

ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications compete directly in approximately 0.47% of their service areas, with ImOn Communications covering 374,327 people nationwide and Great Plains Communications serving 289,466. ImOn Communications primarily delivers internet through a fiber connection; Great Plains Communications specializes in fiber connections. Jump directly to specific sections using the links below, or continue reading for our comprehensive comparison of ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications’s availability, speeds, pricing, and customer satisfaction.

Jump to: Availability | Speeds | Plans & Pricing | Customer Reviews | Fees

ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications | Pros & Cons

ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications | Availability

ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications have distinct coverage footprints across the United States. Our interactive map shows exactly where each provider offers service and where they overlap, helping you understand your options.

Both Providers Available | ImOn Communications Available | Great Plains Communications Available | No Coverage

ImOn Communications currently offers internet service in 36 cities and 11 counties across 3 states, reaching approximately 374,327 residents. Their service area includes major markets like Cedar Rapids, IA; Iowa City, IA; and Dubuque, IA. By comparison, Great Plains Communications serves 289,466 residents in 341 cities and 85 counties in 6 states, with a presence in population centers such as Omaha, NE; Cincinnati, OH; and Greensburg, IN.

Internet availability can vary significantly even within specific cities and zip codes. For the most accurate information about ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications at your location, use our address search tool:

ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications | Speeds & Technology

ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications utilize different network technologies to deliver internet service, resulting in varying speed capabilities across their service areas.

Across their service areas, ImOn Communications primarily delivers internet through fiber, available to 81.3% of their customers. They also offer cable to 23.1% of their coverage area. Great Plains Communications relies on fiber technology, which comprises 88.9% of their network, with DSL available in 17.8% of their service locations.

In terms of potential speeds across the country, Great Plains Communications offers higher overall speeds, with speeds for most covered areas averaging 1,535 Mbps compared to ImOn Communications’s average speed of 869 Mbps. When examining their overlapping service areas, Great Plains Communications delivers faster speeds in 0.00% of locations where both providers operate, similar speeds in 100.00%, and slower speeds in 0.00%.

The availability of each provider’s fastest technology varies significantly by location. ImOn Communications’s premium Fiber service reaches 81.3% of their coverage area. Meanwhile, Great Plains Communications’s top-tier Fiber is available to 88.9% of their footprint. Even within the same technology type, speed offerings can vary based on local infrastructure investments.

ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications | Plans & Pricing

Below are the current internet plans and pricing details for ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications, drawn from our independently maintained pricing database. The source and verification date for each provider's plans are noted beneath the table.

Provider representatives can send plan or pricing updates through our contact page; verified changes publish shortly after review.

ImOn Communications Plans

Great Plains Communications Plans

Most households with 3-5 users need download speeds of at least 100 Mbps for smooth streaming, video conferencing, and everyday internet usage. Larger households or those with heavy users (gamers, 4K streamers, or remote workers) should consider plans with speeds of 300 Mbps or more for optimal performance.

Any prices listed are the base service rates and may not include additional charges such as equipment fees, installation costs, or other service-related expenses. For a comprehensive view of all potential charges, refer to our Fees & Details section below.

ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications | Customer Ratings & Reviews

Compare how real customers rate ImOn Communications and Great Plains Communications based on our comprehensive database of verified customer reviews across all service types.

When comparing customer satisfaction, ImOn Communications earns an overall rating of 3.54 / 5 stars from 13 customer reviews, while Great Plains Communications maintains a 5.00 / 5 rating from 2 reviews. Great Plains Communications outperforms ImOn Communications by 1.5 points in overall satisfaction. ImOn Communications’s best-rated service is their Cable offering at 4.50 / 5 stars, compared to Great Plains Communications’s highest-rated service, DSL, at 5.00 / 5 stars.

Fees vary by plan and location. The fees shown apply to most plans; check with the provider for costs specific to your plan.

When comparing internet providers, remember that advertised prices rarely tell the complete story. Equipment fees alone can add $10-15 per month to your bill, while installation charges, early termination fees, and data overage penalties can significantly increase your total cost of service. Consider these additional costs alongside monthly rates when determining which provider offers the better value for your specific needs.

ImOn Communications vs. Great Plains Communications | Top Cities

ImOn Communications serves 36 cities while Great Plains Communications is available in 341 cities nationwide. The tables below highlight their largest markets and areas where customers can choose between both providers.