EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone

Whether you’re researching EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone internet service at your current address, comparing internet options for potential locations, or just researching alternatives, this detailed comparison will help you understand which provider best suits you.

EarthLink and Central Scott Telephone compete directly in approximately 0.00% of their service areas, with EarthLink covering 268,204,138 people nationwide and Central Scott Telephone serving 14,214. EarthLink primarily delivers internet through a DSL connection; Central Scott Telephone specializes in fiber connections. Jump directly to specific sections using the links below, or continue reading for our comprehensive comparison of EarthLink and Central Scott Telephone’s availability, speeds, pricing, and customer satisfaction.

Jump to: Availability | Speeds | Plans & Pricing | Customer Reviews | Fees

EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone | Pros & Cons

EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone | Availability

EarthLink and Central Scott Telephone have distinct coverage footprints across the United States. Our interactive map shows exactly where each provider offers service and where they overlap, helping you understand your options.

Both Providers Available | EarthLink Available | Central Scott Telephone Available | No Coverage

EarthLink currently offers internet service in 40,546 cities and 2,905 counties across 48 states, reaching approximately 268,204,138 residents. Their service area includes major markets like New York, NY; Los Angeles, CA; and Chicago, IL. By comparison, Central Scott Telephone serves 14,214 residents in 13 cities and 2 counties in 1 state, with a presence in population centers such as Eldridge, IA; Long Grove, IA; and Donahue, IA.

Internet availability can vary significantly even within specific cities and zip codes. For the most accurate information about EarthLink and Central Scott Telephone at your location, use our address search tool:

EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone | Speeds & Technology

EarthLink and Central Scott Telephone utilize different network technologies to deliver internet service, resulting in varying speed capabilities across their service areas.

Across their service areas, EarthLink primarily delivers internet through DSL, available to 41.6% of their customers. They also offer fiber to 41.4% of their coverage area. Central Scott Telephone relies on fiber technology, which comprises 84.9% of their network, with DSL available in 79.4% of their service locations.

In terms of potential speeds across the country, Central Scott Telephone offers higher overall speeds, with speeds for most covered areas averaging 6,801 Mbps compared to EarthLink’s average speed of 1,411 Mbps. When examining their overlapping service areas, Central Scott Telephone delivers faster speeds in 0.00% of locations where both providers operate, similar speeds in 0.00%, and slower speeds in 100.00%.

The availability of each provider’s fastest technology varies significantly by location. EarthLink’s premium Fiber service reaches 41.4% of their coverage area. Meanwhile, Central Scott Telephone’s top-tier Fiber is available to 84.9% of their footprint. Even within the same technology type, speed offerings can vary based on local infrastructure investments.

EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone | Plans & Pricing

Below are the current internet plans and pricing details for Earthlink, drawn from our independently maintained pricing database. The source and verification date for each provider's plans are noted beneath the table. Unfortunately, Central Scott Telephone has not complied with FCC requirements to provide their broadband label data, limiting transparency and the ability for consumers to make direct comparisons.

If you represent Central Scott Telephone, getting listed is simple: publish your machine-readable broadband label file, or send your current plan lineup through our contact page, and your plans will appear here shortly after verification.

EarthLink Plans

Central Scott Telephone Plans

Most households with 3-5 users need download speeds of at least 100 Mbps for smooth streaming, video conferencing, and everyday internet usage. Larger households or those with heavy users (gamers, 4K streamers, or remote workers) should consider plans with speeds of 300 Mbps or more for optimal performance.

Any prices listed are the base service rates and may not include additional charges such as equipment fees, installation costs, or other service-related expenses. For a comprehensive view of all potential charges, refer to our Fees & Details section below.

EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone | Customer Ratings & Reviews

Compare how real customers rate EarthLink and Central Scott Telephone based on our comprehensive database of verified customer reviews across all service types.

When comparing customer satisfaction, EarthLink earns an overall rating of 3.40 / 5 stars from 15 customer reviews, while Central Scott Telephone maintains a 4.00 / 5 rating from 1 reviews. Central Scott Telephone outperforms Earthlink by 0.6 points in overall satisfaction. EarthLink’s best-rated service is their Fiber offering at 3.67 / 5 stars, compared to Central Scott Telephone’s highest-rated service, Fiber, at 4.00 / 5 stars.

Fees vary by plan and location. The fees shown apply to most plans; check with the provider for costs specific to your plan.

When comparing internet providers, remember that advertised prices rarely tell the complete story. Equipment fees alone can add $10-15 per month to your bill, while installation charges, early termination fees, and data overage penalties can significantly increase your total cost of service. Consider these additional costs alongside monthly rates when determining which provider offers the better value for your specific needs.

EarthLink vs. Central Scott Telephone | Top Cities

EarthLink serves 40,546 cities while Central Scott Telephone is available in 13 cities nationwide. The tables below highlight their largest markets and areas where customers can choose between both providers.