EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular

Whether you’re researching EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular internet service at your current address, comparing internet options for potential locations, or just researching alternatives, this detailed comparison will help you understand which provider best suits you.

EarthLink and Inland Cellular compete directly in approximately 0.00% of their service areas, with EarthLink covering 269,769,206 people nationwide and Inland Cellular serving 77,277. EarthLink primarily delivers internet through a fiber connection; Inland Cellular specializes in fiber connections. Jump directly to specific sections using the links below, or continue reading for our comprehensive comparison of EarthLink and Inland Cellular’s availability, speeds, pricing, and customer satisfaction.

Jump to: Availability | Speeds | Plans & Pricing | Customer Reviews | Fees

EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular | Pros & Cons

EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular | Availability

EarthLink and Inland Cellular have distinct coverage footprints across the United States. Our interactive map shows exactly where each provider offers service and where they overlap, helping you understand your options.

Both Providers Available | EarthLink Available | Inland Cellular Available | No Coverage

EarthLink currently offers internet service in 41,344 cities and 2,917 counties across 48 states, reaching approximately 269,769,206 residents. Their service area includes major markets like New York, NY; Los Angeles, CA; and Chicago, IL. By comparison, Inland Cellular serves 77,277 residents in 86 cities and 19 counties in 3 states, with a presence in population centers such as Lewiston, ID; Clarkston Heights-Vineland, WA; and Clarkston, WA.

Internet availability can vary significantly even within specific cities and zip codes. For the most accurate information about EarthLink and Inland Cellular at your location, use our address search tool:

EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular | Speeds & Technology

EarthLink and Inland Cellular utilize different network technologies to deliver internet service, resulting in varying speed capabilities across their service areas.

Across their service areas, EarthLink primarily delivers internet through fiber, available to 0.0% of their customers. They also offer DSL to less than 1% of their coverage area. Inland Cellular relies on fiber technology, which comprises 0.0% of their network, with cable available in less than 1% of their service locations.

In terms of potential speeds across the country, EarthLink offers higher overall speeds, with speeds for most covered areas averaging 1,532 Mbps compared to Inland Cellular’s average speed of 459 Mbps. When examining their overlapping service areas, EarthLink delivers faster speeds in 5.59% of locations where both providers operate, similar speeds in 2.90%, and slower speeds in 91.52%.

The availability of each provider’s fastest technology varies significantly by location. EarthLink’s premium Fiber service reaches 42.7% of their coverage area. Meanwhile, Inland Cellular’s top-tier Fiber is available to 23.1% of their footprint. Even within the same technology type, speed offerings can vary based on local infrastructure investments.

EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular | Plans & Pricing

Below are the current internet plans and pricing details for EarthLink and Inland Cellular, drawn from our independently maintained pricing database. The source and verification date for each provider's plans are noted beneath the table.

Provider representatives can send plan or pricing updates through our contact page; verified changes publish shortly after review.

EarthLink Plans

Inland Cellular Plans

Most households with 3-5 users need download speeds of at least 100 Mbps for smooth streaming, video conferencing, and everyday internet usage. Larger households or those with heavy users (gamers, 4K streamers, or remote workers) should consider plans with speeds of 300 Mbps or more for optimal performance.

Any prices listed are the base service rates and may not include additional charges such as equipment fees, installation costs, or other service-related expenses. For a comprehensive view of all potential charges, refer to our Fees & Details section below.

EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular | Customer Ratings & Reviews

Compare how real customers rate EarthLink and Inland Cellular based on our comprehensive database of verified customer reviews across all service types.

When comparing customer satisfaction, EarthLink earns an overall rating of 3.40 / 5 stars from 15 customer reviews, while Inland Cellular maintains a 2.00 / 5 rating from 1 reviews. EarthLink outperforms Inland Cellular by 1.4 points in overall satisfaction. EarthLink’s best-rated service is their Fiber offering at 3.67 / 5 stars, compared to Inland Cellular’s highest-rated service, , at / 5 stars.

Fees vary by plan and location. The fees shown apply to most plans; check with the provider for costs specific to your plan.

When comparing internet providers, remember that advertised prices rarely tell the complete story. Equipment fees alone can add $10-15 per month to your bill, while installation charges, early termination fees, and data overage penalties can significantly increase your total cost of service. Consider these additional costs alongside monthly rates when determining which provider offers the better value for your specific needs.

EarthLink vs. Inland Cellular | Top Cities

EarthLink serves 41,344 cities while Inland Cellular is available in 86 cities nationwide. The tables below highlight their largest markets and areas where customers can choose between both providers.